Medical Students' Learning Process During Simulated Patient Consultations in Psychiatry: A Grounded Theory Study.

INTRODUCTION: Recent changes in psychiatric care and teaching, which limit patient contact for medical students, can be partially overcome by simulation-based education in psychiatry. The authors explored the learning processes of medical students during meetings with simulated patients to inform efforts to improve this teaching. METHODS: After recruiting 81 undergraduate medical students from 3 universities to participate in 6 simulation sessions in psychiatry, the authors purposively sampled 21 students to participate in face-to-face individual semistructured interviews analyzed with constructivist grounded theory. Integration of this analysis with those of the simulation consultation videotapes and the debriefing audiotapes improved the triangulation process. RESULTS: Three organizational themes were identified: developing and structuring representations of psychiatry; integrating subjectivity into learning; and refining and developing psychiatric praxis. Given the broad and in-depth learning that occurs, simulation in psychiatry should respect content validity of SP portrayals to ensure appropriate learning. However, psychological fidelity seems to provide adequate realism while retaining feasibility. Psychiatric simulation also requires the encouragement of student self-confidence and well-being. Within a reflective framework, simulation triggers cognitive reframing, which can alleviate fears and prejudice toward people with mental disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The holistic interactive learning process involved in simulation can address the complexity of the personal and interpersonal features needed in psychiatry.

Simulation Training in Psychiatry for Medical Education: A Review.

Despite recognised benefits of Simulation-Based Education (SBE) in healthcare, specific adaptations required within psychiatry have slowed its adoption. This article aims to discuss conceptual and practical features of SBE in psychiatry that may support or limit its development, so as to encourage clinicians and educators to consider the implementation of SBE in their practice. SBE took off with the aviation industry and has been steadily adopted in clinical education, alongside role play and patient educators, across many medical specialities. Concurrently, healthcare has shifted towards patient-centred approaches and clinical education has recognised the importance of reflective learning and teaching centred on learners' experiences. SBE is particularly well-suited to promoting a holistic approach to care, reflective learning, emotional awareness in interactions and learning, cognitive reframing, and co-construction of knowledge. These features present an opportunity to enhance education throughout the healthcare workforce, and align particularly well to psychiatric education, where interpersonal and relational dimensions are at the core of clinical skills. Additionally, SBE provides a strategic opportunity for people with lived experience of mental disorders to be directly involved in clinical education. However, tenacious controversies have questioned the adequacy of SBE in the psychiatric field, possibly limiting its adoption. The ability of simulated patients (SPs) to portray complex and contradictory cognitive, psychological and emotional states has been questioned. The validity of SBE to develop a genuine empathetic understanding of patients, to facilitate a comprehensive multiaxial diagnostic formulation, or to develop flexible interpersonal skills has been criticised. Finally, SBE's relevance to developing complex psychotherapeutic skills is much debated, while issues such as symptom induction in SPs or patients involvement raise ethical dilemmas. These controversies can be addressed through adequate evidence, robust learning design, and high standards of practice. Well-designed simulated scenarios can promote a positive consideration of mental disorders and complex clinical skills. Shared guidelines and scenario libraries for simulation can be developed, with expert psychiatrists, patients and students involvement, to offer SPs and educators a solid foundation to develop training. Beyond scenario design, the nuances and complexities in mental healthcare are also duly acknowledged during the debriefing phases, providing a crucial opportunity to reflect on complex interpersonal skills or the role of emotions in clinicians' behaviour. Considered recruitment and support of SPs by clinical educators can help to maintain psychological safety and manage ethical issues. The holistic and reflexive nature of SBE aligns to the rich humanistic tradition nurtured within psychiatry and medicine, presenting the opportunity to expand the use of SBE to support a range of clinical skills and workforce competencies required in psychiatry.

Development, implementation, and evaluation of a mental rehearsal strategy to improve clinical performance and reduce stress: A mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Mental rehearsal is a form of mental training that has been used by physicians and nurses to improve performance of clinical skills, and as a vital component of stress management training. To help novice nurses deal with often stressful clinical events that require the processing of information essential to patient management, a mental rehearsal strategy was developed and implemented in a Year 3 nursing simulation program. Inherent to mental rehearsal is imagery, which facilitates cognitive and affective modification, and reduction of extraneous cognitive load. As such, it was expected that the mental rehearsal strategy would improve students' performance and reduce stress in managing deteriorating patients. METHODS: The study used a mixed methods design. Eighteen Year 3 nursing students participated in the pre- and post-design study, which consisted of the development and implementation of a mental rehearsal strategy. The Rescuing A Patient In Deteriorating Situations (RAPIDS) tool was used to assess performance. Heart rates and systolic blood pressures were used to measure stress. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was used as a psychological measure of stress/anxiety. Five participants were involved in a focus group discussion that evaluated the usefulness of the mental rehearsal strategy. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in performance (P<0.05). However, post-test heart rate and systolic blood pressure were not significantly different from pre-test measures. A comparison of STAI results did not show significant differences between pre- and post-test state anxiety and pre- and post-test trait anxiety. Three themes emerged from the focus group interview: managing stress, using a mental framework, and integrating realistic simulations with the mental rehearsal strategy. CONCLUSION: The mental rehearsal strategy for deteriorating patient management can be valuable based on the findings on performance and based on the participants' feedback. Its role in reducing stress, however, needs further evaluation.

Six formats in simulated and standardized patients use, based on experiences of 13 undergraduate medical curricula in Belgium and the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: In Belgium and the Netherlands, 13 medical schools collaborate with regard to the use of simulated patients (SPs) and standardized patients in their undergraduate curricula. All schools use SPs in their curriculum but schools differ in (a) the timing or placement of the SPs and (b) the way they are used. AIM: To give an overview of the formats used most in undergraduate medical education with SPs, including a description of the impact of these formats on the different aspects of SPs. METHODS: Representatives of all medical schools in Belgium and The Netherlands all provided a structured overview of their use of SPs. We then collectively made a description of the main working formats. For each format we identified salient consequences on the SP level, including whether the format requires simulated or standardized patients or patient-actors, what is the impact of a format on the selection of SPs, content and duration of SP training, whether or not to use checklists in role training, feedback training or not, debriefing of training, impact on the case (role) description (e.g. free or structured), the number of SPs needed, and the selection criteria for SPs. CONCLUSION: The working format with SPs more or less determines the whole process of selection, training, performance, and logistics of SPs.

Effects of communication training on real practice performance: a role-play module versus a standardized patient module.

This study investigated the effectiveness of modules involving standardized patients and role-plays on training communication skills. The first module involved standardized patients and an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE); the second module consisted of peer role-plays and a written examination. A randomized posttest-only control group design with first-year nursing students was used. The intervention group received one-to-one communication training with direct oral feedback from the standardized patient. The control group had training with peer role-playing and mutual feedback. The posttest involved students' rating their self-efficacy, and real patients and clinical supervisors evaluated their communication skills. No significant differences were found between self-efficacy and patient ratings. However, the clinical supervisors rated the intervention group's communication skills to be significantly (p < 0.0001) superior. Assessments by clinical supervisors indicate that communication training modules including standardized patients and an OSCE are superior to communication training modules with peer role-playing.

The case of "Miss Jacobs": adolescent simulated patients and the quality of their role playing, feedback, and personal impact.

OBJECTIVE: Adolescents as standardized patients are relatively new in medical education. Studies have mostly explored the impact of role playing on adolescents trained to perform standardized patient roles for assessment purposes. No studies were found with regard to the quality of adolescents' role playing. We evaluated the effects of performing a patient role on adolescents trained as simulated patients (SPs) for teaching purposes (in contrast to standardized patients) and evaluated the quality of adolescent SPs' role playing and feedback. METHODS: Nine young women, aged 16 to 18 years, were trained to portray roles of adolescents asking their general practitioner for an oral contraceptive. Three adolescent men were trained to portray roles of some of the girls' boyfriends. Each role was developed in consultation with the individual adolescent and was largely based on her own personal experience. Students rated the quality of the adolescent SP's role playing and feedback after each SP encounter on a previously validated questionnaire (the Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients). Both the adolescent SPs and faculty teachers both completed questionnaires on their experiences. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-one students rated the quality of the SPs' role playing and feedback with a mean score of 7.5 of 10. The faculty teachers were also generally positive about the role playing and feedback. Nevertheless, there were some concerns about the quality of the feedback. Adolescent SPs reported no negative effects because of their performance. CONCLUSION: Generally, students and teachers were satisfied with the quality of the role playing and feedback provided by the adolescent SPs. The adolescent SPs experienced no negative effects related to their performance, which confirms earlier findings among adolescent standardized patients.

Strengths and weaknesses of simulated and real patients in the teaching of skills to medical students: a review.

The aim of this review was to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the roles of real and simulated patients in undergraduate medical education. The literature was reviewed in relation to four patient roles: real patients as educational "resource" (passive role), real patients as teachers (active role), and simulated patients as educational resource and teachers. Each of the four patient roles was found to have specific advantages and disadvantages from the perspectives of teachers, students, and patients. For example, advantages of real patients as educational resource were patient-centered learning and high patient satisfaction. Disadvantages were their limited availability and the variability in learning experiences among students. Despite the considerable amount of literature we found, many gaps in knowledge about patient roles in medical education remain and should be addressed by future studies.

The impact of simulation on people who act as simulated patients: a focus group study.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that people who act as simulated patients (SPs) experience negative effects caused by performing patient roles. This study was performed to further explore the impact of simulation and the factors that might affect this impact. The aim was to find ways of preventing negative effects of simulation impacting on our SPs. METHODS: Focus groups interviews were conducted among 35 SPs at Skillslab, University of Maastricht. The discussion was guided by 6 pre-established items. RESULTS: The majority of the SPs appeared to experience negative effects of performing a patient role. The effects were considered as inherent to acting as an SP or due to simulation being a strenuous activity. The impact was short-lived and did not affect SPs' enjoyment of their work. Factors that appeared to affect the impact of performing included: the type of role (whether it is emotionally complex or not); the number of consecutive performances; the length of time between performances; the giving of feedback; the amount of experience, and students. DISCUSSION: Although the SPs were found to experience negative effects caused by playing patient roles, the frequency and intensity of the negative effects were minor. The focus group discussions led to various suggestions for measures to reduce the impact of simulation.

Assessing simulated patients in an educational setting: the MaSP (Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients).

CONTEXT: For more than two decades the Medical School in Maastricht, the Netherlands, has used simulated patients (SPs) to provide students with opportunities to practise their skills in communication and physical examination. In this educational setting a student meets a SP in a videotaped session. Feedback by the SP to the student at the end of the session is considered an important educational feature. We found no instruments to assess individual SP performance during those sessions. OBJECTIVE: To develop a valid, reliable and feasible instrument to evaluate the performance of SPs. METHODS: The content of the instrument was validated through interviews with students, teachers and experts who are involved with SPs. They were asked to indicate key features of good SP performance. Based on the interviews, a written checklist was developed to measure individual SP performance. The instrument was evaluated in a regular SP session at the medical school, involving 152 students and their teachers. MAIN OUTCOMES: All interviewees considered the scale to be satisfactory and the instrument to be valid. The feasibility and reliability of the checklists were investigated using the data of 398 returned checklists. Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.73. Generalizability analysis showed that 12 completed checklists were required to obtain a reliable assessment of one SP. CONCLUSIONS: The Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients (MaSP) appears to be a valid, reliable and feasible tool to assess the performance of SPs in an educational setting.